Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S1
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
54 Imaging
75 Features
84 Overall
78
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Bump to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 1021g - 149 x 110 x 97mm
- Revealed February 2019
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S1 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic S1, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the S1 (24MP) is very comparable but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and S1 (Full frame) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M1 II was launched 3 years earlier than the S1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-M1 II grades vs the S1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Panasonic Lumix DC-S1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Panasonic S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic S1
E-M1 II | S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic S1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
S1 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2019 | September 2016 | More modern by 28 months | |
Display sizing | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 2100k | 1037k | Clearer display (+1063k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic S1
E-M1 II | S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II features outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic S1 has sizing of 149mm x 110mm x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") having a weight of 1021 grams (2.25 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic S1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II versus the S1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and S1 is 68 and 54 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by checking out specs. The image here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and S1.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II due to its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Panasonic S1 will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 II will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2019-02-01 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 225 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Leica L |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 30 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3.2" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 2,100 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 5,760 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync w/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/320 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes (can be charged with high-power laptop/tablet chargers or portable power banks) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) | 1021 grams (2.25 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 149 x 110 x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 95 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 25.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 14.5 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 3333 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 380 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | - |
Storage slots | Dual | Dual |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $2,498 |