Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S1H
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
52 Imaging
75 Features
87 Overall
79
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S1H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Boost to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 5952 x 3988 video
- Leica L Mount
- 1052g - 151 x 114 x 110mm
- Announced August 2019
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S1H Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic S1H, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the S1H (24MP) is relatively close but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and S1H (Full frame) have different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 II was revealed 3 years before the S1H and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M1 II scores vs the S1H when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S1H Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Panasonic Lumix DC-S1H. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Panasonic S1H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic S1H
E-M1 II | S1H |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic S1H over the Olympus E-M1 II
S1H | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2019 | September 2016 | More recent by 35 months | |
Screen size | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 2330k | 1037k | Clearer screen (+1293k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic S1H
E-M1 II | S1H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S1H Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Panasonic S1H has specifications of 151mm x 114mm x 110mm (5.9" x 4.5" x 4.3") with a weight of 1052 grams (2.32 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic S1H in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II versus the S1H.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and S1H is 68 and 52 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S1H Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements merely by researching specifications. The visual here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and S1H.
Plainly, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Panasonic S1H will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older E-M1 II will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S1H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S1H Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1H |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2019-08-28 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 225 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Leica L |
Available lenses | 107 | 30 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3" | 3.2" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 2,330 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 5,760 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/320s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 5952 x 3988 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 5952x3988 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) | 1052 grams (2.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 151 x 114 x 110mm (5.9" x 4.5" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 400 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | Two | Two |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $3,998 |