Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 front
Portability
94
Imaging
39
Features
26
Overall
33

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Panasonic FH25
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
  • Revealed January 2011
  • Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS35
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 Overview

Here, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FH25 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FH25 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M1 II was introduced 5 years later than the FH25 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH25 being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-M1 II scores against the FH25 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FH25

 E-M1 II FH25 
RevealedSeptember 2016January 2011More recent by 70 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1037k230kClearer screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 FH25 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FH25

 E-M1 II FH25 

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II provides physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH25 has specifications of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 II vs the FH25.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and FH25 is 68 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements just by going through specifications. The graphic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and FH25.

To sum up, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will produce extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography factors
Panasonic FH25 Portrait photography factors
75
you can focus manually
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
34
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography factors
Panasonic FH25 Street photography factors
78
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
has touch to focus
weather sealing
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
very good high ISO (25,600)
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography highlights
Panasonic FH25 Sports photography highlights
74
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet mode (1/32,000 seconds)
high fps (60.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
weather sealing
has phase detect AF
terrible battery pack (350 per charge)
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
low fps (4.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography info
Panasonic FH25 Travel photography info
72
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
weather sealing
has touch to focus
MP count good (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
terrible battery pack (350 shots)
65
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography information
Panasonic FH25 Landscape photography information
76
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
weather sealing
has double storage slots
terrible battery pack (350 CIPA)
38
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging features
Panasonic FH25 Vlogging features
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection focusing
high video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
has external mic port
lighter than competition in class (574g)
31
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FH25
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIPanasonic Lumix DMC-FH25
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25
Also referred to as - Lumix DMC-FS35
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2016-09-19 2011-01-05
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII Venus Engine VI
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Lowest boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 121 11
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-224mm (8.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 1,037k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - TFT Screen LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/1600 secs
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames per second 4.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 5.80 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video format MOV, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lb) 159 grams (0.35 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 250 pictures
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Dual One
Retail price $1,700 $180