Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
94 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS35
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FH25 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FH25 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 II was introduced 5 years later than the FH25 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH25 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-M1 II scores against the FH25 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic FH25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FH25
E-M1 II | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | January 2011 | More recent by 70 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FH25 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FH25
E-M1 II | FH25 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II provides physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH25 has specifications of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 II vs the FH25.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and FH25 is 68 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements just by going through specifications. The graphic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and FH25.
To sum up, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will produce extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH25 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FS35 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 159 grams (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 250 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Retail price | $1,700 | $180 |