Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP1

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP1 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Panasonic FP1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP1 Overview

Following is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FP1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FP1 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FP1 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-M1 II was manufactured 6 years after the FP1 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FP1 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-M1 II matches up against the FP1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FP1

 E-M1 II FP1 
LaunchedSeptember 2016January 2010More modern by 82 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kSharper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic FP1 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 FP1 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FP1

 E-M1 II FP1 

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP1 has sizing of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FP1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the FP1.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP1 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and FP1 is 68 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP1 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and FP1.

As you have seen, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide more detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography advice
Panasonic FP1 Portrait photography advice
75
has manual focus
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
21
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography information
Panasonic FP1 Street photography information
78
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
offers touch to focus
environment sealing
lighter than competition in class (574g)
above average high ISO (25,600)
55
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
heavier than others (151 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography info
Panasonic FP1 Sports photography info
74
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
high max frames per second (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect AF
bad battery pack (350 CIPA)
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow continuous shooting (6.0 fps)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography factors
Panasonic FP1 Travel photography factors
72
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
environment sealing
offers touch to focus
good MP (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
bad battery pack (350 CIPA)
50
has built in flash
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than others (151g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography information
Panasonic FP1 Landscape photography information
76
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
does not have anti-alias filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
environment sealing
two card slots
bad battery pack (350 CIPA)
28
built in image stabilization (Optical)
manual focus not available
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual mode
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging details
Panasonic FP1 Vlogging details
79
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focusing
high res video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
includes external mic socket
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic support
heavier than others (151 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FP1
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIPanasonic Lumix DMC-FP1
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1
Class Pro Mirrorless Ultracompact
Launched 2016-09-19 2010-01-06
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII Venus Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW images
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-5.9
Macro focus range - 10cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Highest silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames/s 6.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 4.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video file format MOV, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574g (1.27 lb) 151g (0.33 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Dual One
Price at launch $1,700 $153