Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88bb5/88bb5d6cdc2c05845f07f48bf0fd556e603fdf8e" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 front"
95 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 141g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Released January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5 Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FP5 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FP5 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M1 II was brought out 5 years after the FP5 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FP5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-M1 II scores versus the FP5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Panasonic FP5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FP5
E-M1 II | FP5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 70 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP5 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FP5 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FP5
E-M1 II | FP5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Panasonic FP5 has measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the FP5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a451/0a451fc3c0f7e9e5011bd2aedcbc91b4e68ba8cd" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and FP5 is 68 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0a59/a0a591143ab4355797c96430a2618923b02eaeb7" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through specs. The image below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and FP5.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will produce greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dea9/7dea946ccec051258b059c70b83b55bf11810b63" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3812/e3812ca57f401925fec10c3a4fc9f07ae39976a8" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP5 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Touch Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.90 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 141 gr (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 260 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Retail price | $1,700 | $199 |