Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP7
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
95 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 147g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Announced January 2011
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP7 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FP7, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FP7 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FP7 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M1 II was launched 5 years after the FP7 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FP7 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-M1 II scores vs the FP7 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP7 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP7. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic FP7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FP7
E-M1 II | FP7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | January 2011 | Newer by 70 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP7 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FP7 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FP7
E-M1 II | FP7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP7 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II has got external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Panasonic FP7 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FP7 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II and the FP7.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and FP7 is 68 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP7 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out technical specs. The image below might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and FP7.
As you have seen, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will show more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP7 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FP7 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP7 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Touch Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.90 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 147 grams (0.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 240 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Two | One |
Launch pricing | $1,700 | $227 |