Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS42
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Raise to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS42, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FS42 (1/2.5") use totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1 II was unveiled 7 years after the FS42 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the FS42 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FS42
E-M1 II | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | April 2009 | Newer by 91 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FS42 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FS42
E-M1 II | FS42 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Panasonic FS42 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS42 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II and the FS42.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and FS42 is 68 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through a spec sheet. The pic below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and FS42.
Clearly, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will show extra detail having an extra 10MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1000 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 6.30 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Launch price | $1,700 | $580 |