Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS7
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
95 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 139g - 97 x 54 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS7 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic FS7, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FS7 (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FS7 (1/2.5") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M1 II was announced 7 years after the FS7 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FS7 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M1 II scores against the FS7 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS7 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Panasonic FS7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FS7
E-M1 II | FS7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | January 2009 | Newer by 94 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS7 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FS7 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FS7
E-M1 II | FS7 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS7 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II provides physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Panasonic FS7 has dimensions of 97mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") and a weight of 139 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic FS7 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II against the FS7.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and FS7 is 68 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS7 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The pic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and FS7.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will give more detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS7 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FS7 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2009-01-16 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 139 grams (0.31 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 97 x 54 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Two | One |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $160 |