Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 front
Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
21
Overall
28

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
Panasonic FX48
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2009
  • Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX40
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 Overview

Here is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FX48 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FX48 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M1 II was introduced 7 years later than the FX48 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX48 being a Compact camera.

Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-M1 II scores vs the FX48 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FX48

 E-M1 II FX48 
IntroducedSeptember 2016January 2009Fresher by 94 months
Manual focus Very exact focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1037k230kCrisper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 FX48 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FX48

 E-M1 II FX48 

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX48 has sizing of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II and the FX48.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and FX48 is 68 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing technical specs. The graphic below might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and FX48.

As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Portrait photography with Panasonic FX48
75
has manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
27
offers face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography factors
Panasonic FX48 Street photography factors
78
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
provides touch focus
environment sealing
lighter than others (574 grams)
good high ISO (25,600)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography information
Panasonic FX48 Sports photography information
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet mode (1/32,000s)
fast shooting (60.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
environment sealing
comes with phase detect autofocus
bad battery power (350 CIPA)
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography info
Panasonic FX48 Travel photography info
72
lighter than others (574 grams)
environment sealing
provides touch focus
resolution is good (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
bad battery power (350 shots)
58
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
low megapixels (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography information
Panasonic FX48 Landscape photography information
76
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
does not have anti aliasing filter
good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
has dual storage slots
bad battery power (350 shots)
33
really wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FX48 as a Vlogging camera
79
screen is selfie friendly
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect autofocus
video res high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have microphone jack
lighter than others (574g)
30
really wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FX48
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIPanasonic Lumix DMC-FX48
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48
Otherwise known as - Lumix DMC-FX40
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2016-09-19 2009-01-27
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Highest enhanced ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW format
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 121 11
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-125mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.5"
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/3000 seconds
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 6.00 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 640x480
Video file format MOV, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574g (1.27 lb) 150g (0.33 lb)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 2 1
Launch price $1,700 $325