Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
95 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX40
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 Overview
Here is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FX48 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FX48 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M1 II was introduced 7 years later than the FX48 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX48 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-M1 II scores vs the FX48 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic FX48 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FX48
E-M1 II | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | January 2009 | Fresher by 94 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FX48 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FX48
E-M1 II | FX48 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX48 has sizing of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II and the FX48.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and FX48 is 68 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing technical specs. The graphic below might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and FX48.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX48 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX40 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/3000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 150g (0.33 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Launch price | $1,700 | $325 |