Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX700
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cb52/1cb52a0c40114d28dcc51a80a6a5ed47ea5f756b" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 176g - 104 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced July 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX700 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic FX700, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FX700 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FX700 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M1 II was introduced 6 years later than the FX700 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX700 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-M1 II grades against the FX700 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX700 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic FX700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FX700
E-M1 II | FX700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 76 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX700 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FX700 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FX700
E-M1 II | FX700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX700 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II has got physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Panasonic FX700 has specifications of 104mm x 56mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic FX700 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II vs the FX700.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90639/9063952672918a717b7da47a95437658d6d23d85" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX700 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX700 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and FX700 is 68 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c768d/c768d54f3920b97e7ca7a64caf4ff6700e8ca807" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX700 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX700 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX700 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out specs. The photograph below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and FX700.
All in all, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82907/829077d2e83b20c1f278680f35116856c9ef11d0" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX700 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX700 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3508/b3508ad0fdf4c1d80876de829fc57e15d1501753" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX700 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2010-07-21 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 7.40 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 176 gr (0.39 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 104 x 56 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Price at launch | $1,700 | $399 |