Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ100
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2858b/2858bed53b142b3a6cde4a50f1e0e43bf184210e" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 front"
67 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 540g - 124 x 82 x 92mm
- Launched July 2010
- Newer Model is Panasonic FZ200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ100 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic FZ100, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FZ100 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FZ100 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M1 II was unveiled 6 years later than the FZ100 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ100 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-M1 II scores against the FZ100 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic FZ100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FZ100
E-M1 II | FZ100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | July 2010 | More recent by 76 months |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ100 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FZ100 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ100
E-M1 II | FZ100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ100 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ100 has dimensions of 124mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6") with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic FZ100 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II against the FZ100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/823fb/823fb24f452ccb0c0b9f7146b32661a7f77fa637" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ100 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ100 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and FZ100 is 68 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eef9a/eef9a0019da401cdf6dc93ed448d57955a4fe981" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ100 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ100 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ100 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specs. The graphic underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and FZ100.
All in all, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will deliver more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II should have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72f1f/72f1f48de40ec1676c3c8af8c8dd86110f13496a" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ100 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ100 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db1af/db1af32e9010dcec265bed5a1cca4dc4d8e198a8" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ100 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2010-07-21 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 9.50 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lb) | 540 gr (1.19 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 124 x 82 x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Retail price | $1,700 | $500 |