Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Revealed July 2015
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ200
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic FZ300, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FZ300 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FZ300 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 II was introduced 15 months later than the FZ300 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M1 II scores against the FZ300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic FZ300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FZ300
E-M1 II | FZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | July 2015 | More recent by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FZ300 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Crisper screen (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ300
E-M1 II | FZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ300 has measurements of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") with a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic FZ300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II against the FZ300.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and FZ300 is 68 and 59 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and FZ300.
Clearly, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide extra detail using its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2015-07-16 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/16000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 691g (1.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 380 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 2 | One |
Launch pricing | $1,700 | $598 |