Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front
Portability
59
Imaging
37
Features
73
Overall
51

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Announced September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
Panasonic FZ300
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1/16000s Max Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
  • Revealed July 2015
  • Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ200
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview

Below is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic FZ300, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FZ300 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FZ300 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M1 II was introduced 15 months later than the FZ300 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M1 II scores against the FZ300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FZ300

 E-M1 II FZ300 
RevealedSeptember 2016July 2015More recent by 15 months

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 FZ300 E-M1 II 
Screen resolution1040k1037kCrisper screen (+3k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ300

 E-M1 II FZ300 
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Selfie screen Both are selfie friendly
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison

If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ300 has measurements of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") with a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic FZ300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II against the FZ300.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and FZ300 is 68 and 59 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and FZ300.

Clearly, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide extra detail using its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Portrait photography with Panasonic FZ300
76
manual focus
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
46
focusing manually
includes face detect focus
exports RAW files
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography advice
Panasonic FZ300 Street photography advice
78
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
boasts touch to focus
weather proof
lighter than competitors (574g)
good high ISO (25,600)
59
screen articulates
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
has touch to focus
environment proofing
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
heavier than competitors in class (691 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography advice
Panasonic FZ300 Sports photography advice
75
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
high frames per second (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
weather proof
sensor has phase detect AF
low battery power (350 CIPA)
51
long zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
high shutter speed (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking focus
environment proofing
better than average battery power (380 CIPA)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography details
Panasonic FZ300 Travel photography details
72
lighter than competitors (574 grams)
weather proof
boasts touch to focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
low battery power (350 per charge)
59
better than average battery power (380 shots)
environment proofing
has touch to focus
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
rather wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
heavier than competitors in class (691g)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography advice
Panasonic FZ300 Landscape photography advice
76
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
does not have anti-alias filter
good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
weather proof
has dual storage slots
low battery power (350 per charge)
52
focusing manually
rather wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
environment proofing
better than average battery power (380 CIPA)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging factors
Panasonic FZ300 Vlogging factors
79
display is selfie friendly
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect focusing
high video quality (4096 x 2160 resolution)
includes mic jack
lighter than competitors (574g)
62
rather wide (25mm)
screen is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
has mic jack
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
heavier than competitors in class (691g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ300
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIPanasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2016-09-19 2015-07-16
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII Venus Engine
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW support
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 121 49
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dot 1,040 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot 1,440 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/16000s
Highest silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames per second 12.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 8.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 3840x2160
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574g (1.27 lb) 691g (1.52 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 shots 380 shots
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots 2 One
Launch pricing $1,700 $598