Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c05f/5c05ff7b3fcd9fe9d0e7104a454032006760a3f9" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 front"
83 Imaging
51 Features
62 Overall
55
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 160 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 336g - 115 x 84 x 47mm
- Announced July 2011
- Old Model is Panasonic G2
- Later Model is Panasonic G5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and G3 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M1 II was manufactured 5 years after the G3 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-M1 II grades vs the G3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic G3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic G3
E-M1 II | G3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | July 2011 | More modern by 64 months |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic G3 over the Olympus E-M1 II
G3 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic G3
E-M1 II | G3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both are selfie friendly | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Panasonic G3 has dimensions of 115mm x 84mm x 47mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 336 grams (0.74 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the G3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98ad2/98ad276d04cedf16a150a24b4ad4be6729b7407c" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and G3 is 68 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e36b/8e36b32d88e2e1df4f6148f653286b4b7e6eb106" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by checking out specifications. The picture below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and G3.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus E-M1 II to show more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1672/e16722520f0dadd6530dd6a747c5be9ba48d9842" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8aea/b8aea8b439eda42302cce4e6cbe9a79b39f2aa3b" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2011-07-11 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4592 x 3448 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 160 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,440 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 11.00 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30fps)) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 336 grams (0.74 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 115 x 84 x 47mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | 56 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 21.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 10.6 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 667 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 270 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Launch price | $1,700 | $500 |