Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G95

Portability
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 front
Portability
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
Panasonic G95
(Full Review)
  • 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
  • Released April 2019
  • Other Name is Lumix DMC-G90
  • Succeeded the Panasonic G85
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G95 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G95, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the G95 (20.3MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M1 II was revealed 3 years prior to the G95 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M1 II scores versus the G95 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic G95

		

		

			
 E-M1 II G95 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Olympus E-M1 II

		

		

			
 G95 E-M1 II 
ReleasedApril 2019September 2016Newer by 30 months
Display resolution1240k1037kSharper display (+203k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic G95

		

		

			
 E-M1 II G95 
Manual focus  Dial accurate focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen  Both good for selfies
Touch display  Easily navigate
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II provides exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Panasonic G95 has dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") with a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G95 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II versus the G95.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G95 size comparison
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and G95 is 68 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G95 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Typically, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specifications. The picture here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and G95.
To sum up, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Panasonic G95 to provide greater detail because of its extra 0.3MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 II will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
	
			Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G95 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Portrait photography with Panasonic G95
75
 manual focus
 good MP (20MP)
 sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
 features face detection autofocus
 exports RAW formats
77
 has manual focus
 MP count decent (20.3 megapixels)
 decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
 comes with face detect focusing
 delivers RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Street Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Street photography advice
Panasonic G95 Street photography advice
78
 fully articulated screen
 image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
 exports RAW formats
 features touch focus
 weather sealing
 lighter than average in class (574 grams)
 great high ISO (25,600)
78
 fully articulated screen
 built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
 delivers RAW formats
 has touch focus
 environment proofing
 very good high ISO (25,600)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Sports Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography highlights
Panasonic G95 Sports photography highlights
74
 maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
 quiet shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
 high frames per second (60.0 frames per second)
 image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 good MP (20 megapixels)
 sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
 features tracking autofocus
 weather sealing
 supports phase detect autofocus
 terrible battery power (350 CIPA)
68
 silent shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 MP count decent (20.3 megapixels)
 decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
 comes with tracking focus
 environment proofing
 terrible battery life (290 per charge)
 lack of phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Travel Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography details
Panasonic G95 Travel photography details
72
 lighter than average in class (574 grams)
 weather sealing
 features touch focus
 good MP (20 megapixels)
 selfie friendly display
 terrible battery power (350 shots)
73
 environment proofing
 has bluetooth
 has touch focus
 MP count decent (20.3 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 screen is selfie friendly
 terrible battery life (290 shots)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Landscape Comparison
 Olympus E-M1 II as a Landscape photography camera
 Panasonic G95 as a Landscape photography camera
76
 manual focus
 interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
 pretty good screen size (3 inches)
 image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 good MP (20 megapixels)
 sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
 no low pass filter
 great high ISO (25,600)
 exports RAW formats
 weather sealing
 2 card slots
 terrible battery power (350 CIPA)
76
 has manual focus
 swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
 pretty good screen size (3 inches)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 MP count decent (20.3 megapixels)
 decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
 no low pass filter
 very good high ISO (25,600)
 delivers RAW formats
 environment proofing
 terrible battery life (290 per charge)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging factors
Panasonic G95 Vlogging factors
79
 selfie friendly display
 built-in touchscreen
 image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 features face detection autofocus
 video res high (4096 x 2160 resolution)
 comes with external mic support
 lighter than average in class (574 grams)
79
 screen is selfie friendly
 touchscreen enabled
 built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 comes with face detect focusing
 video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
 has microphone port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	

		

			
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic G95 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic G95
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIPanasonic Lumix DMC-G95
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95
Also referred to as - Lumix DMC-G90
Category Pro Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2016-09-19 2019-04-05
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII Venus Engine
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 20.3 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 25600 25600
Min native ISO 200 200
RAW photos    
Min enhanced ISO 64 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
AF tracking    
AF selectice    
Center weighted AF    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Total focus points 121 49
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 107 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dot 1,240 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch operation    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.74x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000s 1/16000s
Continuous shutter speed 60.0 frames/s 9.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 6.40 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
Hot shoe    
AEB    
WB bracketing    
Fastest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 3840x2160
Video file format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 574 gr (1.27 lb) 536 gr (1.18 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images 290 images
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots)
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported)
Storage slots Dual Single
Price at release $1,700 $998