Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF1

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 front
Portability
85
Imaging
47
Features
47
Overall
47

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF1 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Panasonic GF1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 385g - 119 x 71 x 36mm
  • Revealed October 2009
  • Replacement is Panasonic GF2
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF1 Overview

Following is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF1, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and GF1 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (Four Thirds).

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M1 II was introduced 7 years after the GF1 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic GF1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M1 II grades vs the GF1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic GF1

 E-M1 II GF1 
RevealedSeptember 2016October 2009More modern by 85 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k460kCrisper screen (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic GF1 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 GF1 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic GF1

 E-M1 II GF1 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF1 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Panasonic GF1 has dimensions of 119mm x 71mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the GF1.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF1 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and GF1 is 68 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF1 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by checking out specifications. The image here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and GF1.

Plainly, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Olympus E-M1 II to provide more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots way more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II will have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic GF1 as a Portrait photography camera
75
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
60
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focus
delivers RAW files
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography highlights
Panasonic GF1 Street photography highlights
78
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
includes touch focus
weather proofing
lighter than competition in class (574g)
great high ISO (25,600)
64
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Sports photography with Panasonic GF1
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
high fps (60.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
weather proofing
has phase detect autofocus
low battery (350 CIPA)
44
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
good battery life (380 shots)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography factors
Panasonic GF1 Travel photography factors
72
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
weather proofing
includes touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
low battery (350 per charge)
59
good battery life (380 CIPA)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse function
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography info
Panasonic GF1 Landscape photography info
76
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
great high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
weather proofing
2 card slots
low battery (350 CIPA)
60
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (380 CIPA)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
missing Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging highlights
Panasonic GF1 Vlogging highlights
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect autofocus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
has microphone support
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
25
supports face detection focus
does not have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic GF1
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIPanasonic Lumix DMC-GF1
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1
Type Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2016-09-19 2009-10-14
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII Venus Engine HD
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 121 23
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 107 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,037k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 6.00 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video data format MOV, H.264 AVCHD Lite
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574g (1.27 pounds) 385g (0.85 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 119 x 71 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 54
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 21.2
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 10.3
DXO Low light score 1312 513
Other
Battery life 350 photographs 380 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images))
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/MMC
Storage slots Dual Single
Pricing at release $1,700 $400