Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF3

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 front
Portability
90
Imaging
48
Features
48
Overall
48

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF3 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
Panasonic GF3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 160 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 264g - 108 x 67 x 32mm
  • Released August 2011
  • Previous Model is Panasonic GF2
  • Successor is Panasonic GF5
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF3 Overview

On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic GF3, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and GF3 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (Four Thirds).

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M1 II was revealed 5 years after the GF3 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic GF3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the GF3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic GF3

 E-M1 II GF3 
ReleasedSeptember 2016August 2011Newer by 63 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k460kSharper screen (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Panasonic GF3 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 GF3 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic GF3

 E-M1 II GF3 
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF3 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to travel with your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF3 has measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 264 grams (0.58 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic GF3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II versus the GF3.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF3 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and GF3 is 68 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF3 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and GF3.

As you can see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus E-M1 II to show extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II should have an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography info
Panasonic GF3 Portrait photography info
75
manual focus
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
55
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
no external flash support
low MP (12 megapixels)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography highlights
Panasonic GF3 Street photography highlights
78
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
boasts touch to focus
environment proof
lighter than average in class (574 grams)
great ISO range (25,600)
70
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
provides touch focus
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography advice
Panasonic GF3 Sports photography advice
74
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
high frames per second (60.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proof
sensor has phase detect autofocus
not so great battery pack (350 shots)
38
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
max fps low (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
not so great battery power (300 per charge)
has no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic GF3 as a Travel photography camera
72
lighter than average in class (574g)
environment proof
boasts touch to focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
not so great battery pack (350 CIPA)
58
provides touch focus
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
not so great battery power (300 per charge)
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography info
Panasonic GF3 Landscape photography info
76
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment proof
2 card slots
not so great battery pack (350 per charge)
55
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
not so great battery power (300 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging information
Panasonic GF3 Vlogging information
79
selfie friendly screen
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detection autofocus
high video quality (4096 x 2160 pxls)
includes external mic support
lighter than average in class (574g)
32
built-in touchscreen
provides face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
lack of mic socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic GF3
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIPanasonic Lumix DMC-GF3
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3
Type Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2016-09-19 2011-08-11
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII Venus Engine FHD
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 160
RAW data
Lowest boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 121 23
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 107 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,037k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology - TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 6.30 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MOV, H.264 AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 pounds) 264 grams (0.58 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 108 x 67 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 50
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 20.6
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 10.1
DXO Low light rating 1312 459
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 300 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images))
Time lapse recording
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Two Single
Cost at launch $1,700 $360