Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GH4
Portability
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Portability
66 Imaging
53 Features
88 Overall
67
66 Imaging
53 Features
88 Overall
67
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GH4 Key Specs
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
Panasonic GH4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 560g - 133 x 93 x 84mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Succeeded the Panasonic GH3
- Successor is Panasonic GH5
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GH4 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic GH4, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and GH4 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 II was unveiled 2 years after the GH4 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the E-M1 II scores vs the GH4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GH4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic GH4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic GH4
| E-M1 II | GH4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2016 |  | February 2014 | Newer by 32 months |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 1036k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GH4 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| GH4 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic GH4
| E-M1 II | GH4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Both good for selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GH4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Panasonic GH4 has dimensions of 133mm x 93mm x 84mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 560 grams (1.23 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic GH4 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II and the GH4.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and GH4 is 68 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GH4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through specifications. The image below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and GH4.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus E-M1 II to result in extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GH4 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic GH4 as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focus
exports RAW formats
manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Street photography advice
Panasonic GH4 Street photography advice
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
boasts touch focus
weather sealing
lighter than competition (574g)
great high ISO (25,600)
fully articulated screen
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
offers touch focus
environment proof
lighter than average in class (560 grams)
good high ISO (25,600)
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography info
Panasonic GH4 Sports photography info
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
quiet mode (1/32,000s)
max frames per second high (60.0 frames/s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
weather sealing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
not so great battery power (350 per charge)
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
MP count decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
environment proof
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Panasonic GH4
lighter than competition (574g)
weather sealing
boasts touch focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
not so great battery power (350 CIPA)
lighter than average in class (560 grams)
environment proof
offers touch focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography details
Panasonic GH4 Landscape photography details
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
does not have low pass filter
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
weather sealing
2 card slots
not so great battery power (350 shots)
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
environment proof
no image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging info
Panasonic GH4 Vlogging info
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focus
high res video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
includes microphone support
lighter than competition (574g)
selfie friendly screen
built-in touchscreen
includes face detect autofocus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 resolution)
includes mic jack
lighter than average in class (560 grams)
no image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GH4 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2014-02-07 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine IX |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 107 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 1,036k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,359k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.67x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 17.00 m (at ISO 200) |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, auto/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync/redeye reduction, forced off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4096 x 2160 (24p), 3840 x 2160 (24p, 25p, 30p), 1920 x 1080 (24p, 25p, 30p, 50p, 60p), 1280 x 720 (24p, 25p, 30p), 640 x 480 (25p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 4096x2160 |
| Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 560 gr (1.23 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 133 x 93 x 84mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 80 | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 23.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 12.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 791 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | 500 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | DMW-BLF19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs (single or three-shot)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Dual | Single |
| Launch cost | $1,700 | $1,500 |