Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LF1
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
92 Imaging
37 Features
55 Overall
44
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LF1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 192g - 103 x 62 x 28mm
- Released November 2013
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LF1 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic LF1, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and LF1 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and LF1 (1/1.7") have different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M1 II was announced 2 years later than the LF1 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic LF1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-M1 II grades against the LF1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LF1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Panasonic LF1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic LF1
E-M1 II | LF1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | November 2013 | Fresher by 35 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 920k | Sharper display (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic LF1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
LF1 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic LF1
E-M1 II | LF1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LF1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II has physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic LF1 has dimensions of 103mm x 62mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic LF1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II versus the LF1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and LF1 is 68 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LF1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by checking specifications. The visual below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and LF1.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will resolve greater detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LF1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LF1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2013-11-26 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lbs) | 192g (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 103 x 62 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | 52 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 20.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 11.6 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 211 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 250 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Two | One |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $500 |