Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LX3
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
91 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-60mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 265g - 109 x 60 x 27mm
- Revealed November 2008
- Refreshed by Panasonic LX5
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LX3 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LX3, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and LX3 (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and LX3 (1/1.63") provide different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M1 II was announced 7 years later than the LX3 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic LX3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-M1 II scores vs the LX3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LX3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic LX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic LX3
E-M1 II | LX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | November 2008 | Fresher by 96 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic LX3 over the Olympus E-M1 II
LX3 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic LX3
E-M1 II | LX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LX3 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II provides outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Panasonic LX3 has dimensions of 109mm x 60mm x 27mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LX3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II and the LX3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and LX3 is 68 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LX3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing just by reading technical specs. The graphic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and LX3.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer you more detail with its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic LX3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2008-11-04 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.63" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-60mm (2.5x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-2.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 8.30 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (HD 24 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30fps), 320 x 240 (10fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 265g (0.58 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 109 x 60 x 27mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | 39 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 19.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 94 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Pricing at release | $1,700 | $449 |