Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic SZ1
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic SZ1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 131g - 99 x 59 x 21mm
- Announced January 2012
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic SZ1 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic SZ1, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SZ1 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SZ1 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M1 II was brought out 4 years after the SZ1 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic SZ1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 II matches up against the SZ1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic SZ1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic SZ1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic SZ1
E-M1 II | SZ1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | January 2012 | More modern by 58 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
SZ1 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic SZ1
E-M1 II | SZ1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic SZ1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II features exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Panasonic SZ1 has sizing of 99mm x 59mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 131 grams (0.29 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic SZ1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the SZ1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and SZ1 is 68 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic SZ1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through a spec sheet. The picture below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and SZ1.
Clearly, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will give more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic SZ1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic SZ1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 4cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) | 131 gr (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 99 x 59 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 250 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | Single |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $179 |