Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic SZ7
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
95 Imaging
38 Features
41 Overall
39
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic SZ7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 133g - 99 x 59 x 21mm
- Released January 2012
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic SZ7 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic SZ7, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SZ7 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SZ7 (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was released 4 years after the SZ7 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic SZ7 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-M1 II scores versus the SZ7 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic SZ7 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ7. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Panasonic SZ7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic SZ7
E-M1 II | SZ7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | January 2012 | Newer by 58 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ7 over the Olympus E-M1 II
SZ7 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic SZ7
E-M1 II | SZ7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic SZ7 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic SZ7 has proportions of 99mm x 59mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic SZ7 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II against the SZ7.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and SZ7 is 68 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic SZ7 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by checking a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and SZ7.
Clearly, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic SZ7 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic SZ7 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ7 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 4cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 133 gr (0.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 99 x 59 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 220 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $199 |