Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54b89/54b89e3d62e5768038cf7e2b5cf20b1bfe152930" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS5 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS5 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 214g - 110 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2013
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FT5
- Previous Model is Panasonic TS4
- Replacement is Panasonic TS6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TS5 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TS5 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M1 II was revealed 3 years after the TS5 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic TS5 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 II grades versus the TS5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS5. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic TS5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic TS5
E-M1 II | TS5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | July 2013 | Newer by 39 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS5 over the Olympus E-M1 II
TS5 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic TS5
E-M1 II | TS5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Panasonic TS5 has dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the TS5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70f9c/70f9cc5715329913c7e5786826715395febdd626" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and TS5 is 68 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1645d/1645d7adae8de9b8c6861f98d02d429fe2bb37df" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The picture below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and TS5.
As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II using its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd4b0/fd4b0cab02a975917ee4846e8834b2c0bfe07358" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d447/0d44771e8396dbbba2617ed96e8c00c29a519b07" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS5 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS5 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FT5 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2013-07-12 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1300s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 110 x 67 x 29mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 370 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | DMW-BCM13 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Retail price | $1,700 | $350 |