Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS1
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
91 Imaging
33 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Announced May 2009
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ6
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS1 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS1, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and ZS1 (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and ZS1 (1/2.5") feature different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M1 II was manufactured 7 years later than the ZS1 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-M1 II grades against the ZS1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic ZS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic ZS1
E-M1 II | ZS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | May 2009 | More recent by 90 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
ZS1 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic ZS1
E-M1 II | ZS1 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II provides outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS1 has sizing of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II versus the ZS1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and ZS1 is 68 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements just by seeing specs. The graphic here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and ZS1.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will show greater detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images much more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ6 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 229 grams (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Price at launch | $1,700 | $0 |