Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS10
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
91 Imaging
37 Features
46 Overall
40
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 219g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Announced January 2011
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ20 / Lumix DMC-TZ22
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS10 Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic ZS10, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and ZS10 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and ZS10 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 II was unveiled 5 years later than the ZS10 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS10 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M1 II grades vs the ZS10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS10 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Panasonic ZS10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic ZS10
E-M1 II | ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | January 2011 | Fresher by 69 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS10 over the Olympus E-M1 II
ZS10 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic ZS10
E-M1 II | ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS10 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II has outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS10 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic ZS10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II and the ZS10.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and ZS10 is 68 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and ZS10.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with greater detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS10 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ20 / Lumix DMC-TZ22 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2011-01-25 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) | 219 gr (0.48 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 260 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Launch pricing | $1,700 | $350 |