Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS15
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 208g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Introduced June 2012
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ25
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS20
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS15 Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS15, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and ZS15 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and ZS15 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was launched 4 years after the ZS15 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS15 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-M1 II scores against the ZS15 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS15 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic ZS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic ZS15
E-M1 II | ZS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | June 2012 | More modern by 52 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper screen (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS15 over the Olympus E-M1 II
ZS15 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic ZS15
E-M1 II | ZS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS15 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II provides outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS15 has dimensions of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS15 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II vs the ZS15.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and ZS15 is 68 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS15 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The image underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and ZS15.
Clearly, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS15 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS15 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ25 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2012-06-29 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 15 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 6.40 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 208g (0.46 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 260 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $279 |