Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS25
68 Imaging
58 Features
93 Overall
72
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS20
- Successor is Panasonic ZS30
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS25 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic ZS25, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and ZS25 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and ZS25 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 II was announced 3 years after the ZS25 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS25 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-M1 II scores vs the ZS25 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS25 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Panasonic ZS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic ZS25
| E-M1 II | ZS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2016 | January 2013 | More modern by 46 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| ZS25 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic ZS25
| E-M1 II | ZS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS25 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS25 has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic ZS25 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the ZS25.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and ZS25 is 68 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS25 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The image underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and ZS25.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 6.40 m |
| Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | 260 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 2 | Single |
| Pricing at release | $1,700 | $300 |