Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645Z
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
49 Imaging
80 Features
74 Overall
77
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645Z Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 204800
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1550g - 156 x 117 x 123mm
- Introduced April 2014
- Old Model is Pentax 645D
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645Z Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645Z, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and 645Z (51MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and 645Z (Medium format) feature different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1 II was manufactured 2 years after the 645Z which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax 645Z being a Large SLR camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the 645Z when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645Z Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Pentax 645Z. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Pentax 645Z Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax 645Z
E-M1 II | 645Z | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | April 2014 | More modern by 30 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax 645Z over the Olympus E-M1 II
645Z | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax 645Z
E-M1 II | 645Z | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 1037k | 1037k | Identical screen resolution |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645Z Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II features external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Pentax 645Z has dimensions of 156mm x 117mm x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") and a weight of 1550 grams (3.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645Z in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II versus the 645Z.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and 645Z is 68 and 49 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645Z Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes only by looking through a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and 645Z.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Pentax 645Z will render more detail due to its extra 31 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645Z Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645Z Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax 645Z | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax 645Z |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro DSLR |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2014-04-15 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | PRIME III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Medium format |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 51 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 8256 x 6192 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 204800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 27 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax 645AF2 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 6 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3.2" |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.85x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync+Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, contrast-control-sync, high-speed sync, wireless sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/125s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p,24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) | 1550 grams (3.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 156 x 117 x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | 101 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 14.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 4505 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 650 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | Two | Two |
Retail price | $1,700 | $5,024 |