Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Efina

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Pentax Efina front
Portability
97
Imaging
38
Features
26
Overall
33

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Efina Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Pentax Efina
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
  • 91g - 87 x 54 x 21mm
  • Launched June 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Efina Overview

Lets look closer at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Efina, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and Efina (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and Efina (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M1 II was manufactured 3 years after the Efina which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax Efina being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-M1 II scores vs the Efina in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax Efina

 E-M1 II Efina 
LaunchedSeptember 2016June 2013Newer by 41 months
Focus manually More exact focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1037k230kClearer display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Pentax Efina over the Olympus E-M1 II

 Efina E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax Efina

 E-M1 II Efina 

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Efina Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Pentax Efina has proportions of 87mm x 54mm x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 91 grams (0.20 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Efina in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II vs the Efina.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Efina size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and Efina is 68 and 97 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Efina top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Efina Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching specifications. The pic below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and Efina.

Plainly, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will render extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II will have an edge in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Efina sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Efina Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Efina Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography factors
Pentax Efina Portrait photography factors
76
focusing manually
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focus
exports RAW formats
34
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography features
Pentax Efina Street photography features
78
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
boasts touch to focus
environment proof
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
above average high ISO (25,600)
64
built in image stabilization (Digital)
lighter than competition in class (91 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography information
Pentax Efina Sports photography information
75
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
high max frames per second (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
environment proof
sensor has phase detect auto focus
terrible battery power (350 shots)
35
built in image stabilization (Digital)
resolution is good (14MP)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography info
Pentax Efina Travel photography info
72
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
environment proof
boasts touch to focus
good resolution (20MP)
selfie friendly screen
terrible battery power (350 CIPA)
69
lighter than competition in class (91 grams)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Landscape photography camera
Pentax Efina as a Landscape photography camera
76
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have low pass filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
environment proof
two card slots
terrible battery power (350 shots)
38
relatively wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.5 inch)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging advice
Pentax Efina Vlogging advice
79
selfie friendly screen
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect focus
high res video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
includes microphone socket
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
33
relatively wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detection focus
lighter than competition in class (91 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Efina Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax Efina
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIPentax Efina
General Information
Make Olympus Pentax
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Pentax Efina
Category Pro Mirrorless Ultracompact
Revealed 2016-09-19 2013-06-03
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 25600 1600
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW images
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-6.3
Macro focusing distance - 20cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.5"
Display resolution 1,037k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology - QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 1/8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1400 seconds
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 4.10 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720, 640 x 480
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video format MOV, H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 gr (1.27 pounds) 91 gr (0.20 pounds)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 87 x 54 x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images 200 images
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 D-LI109
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SC/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 2 1
Retail cost $1,700 $10