Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/376a8/376a854d97b2e287bdc42f8b91c8e24498c40056" alt="Pentax K-1 Mark II front Pentax K-1 Mark II front"
55 Imaging
77 Features
82 Overall
79
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 819200
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF4 Mount
- 1010g - 137 x 110 x 86mm
- Announced February 2018
- Previous Model is Pentax K-1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and K-1 II (36MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and K-1 II (Full frame) feature totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M1 II was revealed 17 months prior to the K-1 II which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-1 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the K-1 II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Pentax K-1 Mark II. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Pentax K-1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax K-1 II
E-M1 II | K-1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-1 II over the Olympus E-M1 II
K-1 II | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | September 2016 | Newer by 17 months |
Screen sizing | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax K-1 II
E-M1 II | K-1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 1037k | Exact same screen resolution |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II offers exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-1 II has specifications of 137mm x 110mm x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 1010 grams (2.23 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II against the K-1 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/254dd/254dd3717042a11a0005c2ceafdfa731ccff05cf" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and K-1 II is 68 and 55 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76991/7699145890147176093f80f272b36b1a461b8855" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out specs. The picture below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and K-1 II.
All in all, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Pentax K-1 II will show more detail because of its extra 16MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 II will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4287/a428702c39bc41a235ece5b97f5abd9ce18737f4" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f8f6/4f8f6dc9c854f6c25019e30fe1b7972afc089a84" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-1 Mark II |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2018-02-22 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | PRIME IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 36 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 7360 x 4912 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 819200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 33 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF4 |
Total lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.2 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per second | 4.4 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/200 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 1010g (2.23 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 137 x 110 x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 670 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
Storage slots | Dual | Dual |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $1,737 |