Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-30
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f10a/6f10a47131c9d5756aa9d066ef058620213d1e35" alt="Pentax K-30 front Pentax K-30 front"
63 Imaging
57 Features
66 Overall
60
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 650g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Released October 2012
- Later Model is Pentax K-50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-30 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M1 II versus Pentax K-30, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and K-30 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and K-30 (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M1 II was manufactured 3 years after the K-30 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the K-30 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-30 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Pentax K-30. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Pentax K-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax K-30
E-M1 II | K-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | ![]() | October 2012 | Newer by 48 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Sharper screen (+116k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-30 over the Olympus E-M1 II
K-30 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax K-30
E-M1 II | K-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-30 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-30 has proportions of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") along with a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II versus Pentax K-30 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II against the K-30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2152c/2152cff8d6b8adc68061344bf8c2eba4b3bc75f1" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-30 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-30 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and K-30 is 68 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9e19/f9e19b6a227338d4eda60d8f434be72486f336bb" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-30 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-30 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-30 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by going through specs. The pic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and K-30.
All in all, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II should have an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13793/13793031a9e2060af33c32e327095215789d1d57" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-30 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-30 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a2a4/0a2a49546eb96544bffb9626a2c232c73ffce884" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-30 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-30 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2012-10-29 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Prime M |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye,Slow Sync, Slow Sync+ Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) | 650 gr (1.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 13.0 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 1129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 410 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | D-LI109,4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $525 |