Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 II
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
60 Imaging
57 Features
82 Overall
67
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 760g - 131 x 97 x 73mm
- Released June 2013
- Previous Model is Pentax K-5
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 II Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax K-5 II, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and K-5 II (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and K-5 II (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 II was manufactured 3 years after the K-5 II which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-5 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-M1 II grades against the K-5 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Pentax K-5 II. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Pentax K-5 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax K-5 II
| E-M1 II | K-5 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2016 | June 2013 | Newer by 41 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 921k | Clearer screen (+116k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-5 II over the Olympus E-M1 II
| K-5 II | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax K-5 II
| E-M1 II | K-5 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Pentax K-5 II has specifications of 131mm x 97mm x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 760 grams (1.68 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax K-5 II in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 II versus the K-5 II.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and K-5 II is 68 and 60 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through specifications. The picture here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and K-5 II.
Plainly, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II featuring a smaller sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Olympus E-M1 II will result in more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 II Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 II Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-5 II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-5 II |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2013-06-04 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | Prime II |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.61x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, High speed, Rear curtain and Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (25 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (25, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 760g (1.68 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 131 x 97 x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 80 | 82 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 23.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 14.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 1235 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 980 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | D-LI90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 2 | One |
| Cost at release | $1,700 | $830 |