Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-500
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
64 Imaging
58 Features
70 Overall
62
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 646g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Introduced November 2013
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-500 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus E-M1 II versus Pentax K-500, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and K-500 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and K-500 (APS-C) come with different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M1 II was announced 2 years after the K-500 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-500 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-M1 II grades vs the K-500 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Pentax K-500. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Pentax K-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax K-500
E-M1 II | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | November 2013 | Newer by 35 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 921k | Crisper display (+116k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-500 over the Olympus E-M1 II
K-500 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax K-500
E-M1 II | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Pentax K-500 has specifications of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 646 grams (1.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 II versus Pentax K-500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II against the K-500.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and K-500 is 68 and 64 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-500 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specs. The image underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and K-500.
All in all, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer you more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images much more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-500 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-500 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2013-11-27 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | PRIME M |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 51600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 646g (1.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 13.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 1087 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 710 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $600 |