Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-70
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
62 Imaging
67 Features
81 Overall
72
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 688g - 126 x 93 x 74mm
- Revealed June 2016
- Later Model is Pentax KF
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-70 Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-70, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the K-70 (24MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and K-70 (APS-C) use different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M1 II was released 4 months later than the K-70 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-70 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-M1 II grades against the K-70 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-70 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Pentax K-70. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Pentax K-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax K-70
E-M1 II | K-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1037k | 921k | Crisper screen (+116k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-70 over the Olympus E-M1 II
K-70 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax K-70
E-M1 II | K-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | June 2016 | Same age | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-70 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II features outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-70 has sizing of 126mm x 93mm x 74mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 688 grams (1.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-70 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II and the K-70.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and K-70 is 68 and 62 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-70 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by going through technical specs. The visual underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and K-70.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Pentax K-70 will produce more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-70 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-70 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2016-06-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | PRIME MII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.63x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/6000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lb) | 688 gr (1.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 126 x 93 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 410 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | 2 | Single |
Price at release | $1,700 | $649 |