Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


67 Imaging
52 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 598g - 125 x 97 x 68mm
- Launched March 2011

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and K-r (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and K-r (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.

The E-M1 II was announced 5 years after the K-r which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-r being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-M1 II scores versus the K-r in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Pentax K-r. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Pentax K-r Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax K-r
E-M1 II | K-r | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | March 2011 | Newer by 68 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Sharper display (+116k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-r over the Olympus E-M1 II
K-r | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax K-r
E-M1 II | K-r | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-r has measurements of 125mm x 97mm x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") with a weight of 598 grams (1.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II and the K-r.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and K-r is 68 and 67 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The pic underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and K-r.
All in all, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus E-M1 II will result in more detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II will have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-r | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-r |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2011-03-11 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Prime II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync, High-Speed Sync and Wireless Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 598g (1.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 125 x 97 x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 755 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 470 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | D-LI109,4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $1,100 |