Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
67 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 598g - 125 x 97 x 68mm
- Launched March 2011
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and K-r (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and K-r (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1 II was announced 5 years after the K-r which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-r being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-M1 II scores versus the K-r in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Pentax K-r. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Pentax K-r Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax K-r
E-M1 II | K-r | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | March 2011 | Newer by 68 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 921k | Sharper display (+116k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-r over the Olympus E-M1 II
K-r | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax K-r
E-M1 II | K-r | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-r has measurements of 125mm x 97mm x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") with a weight of 598 grams (1.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II and the K-r.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and K-r is 68 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The pic underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and K-r.
All in all, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus E-M1 II will result in more detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-r Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-r | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-r |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2011-03-11 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Prime II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync, High-Speed Sync and Wireless Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 598g (1.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 125 x 97 x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 755 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 470 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | D-LI109,4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $1,100 |