Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K10D
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K10D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Launched December 2006
- Later Model is Pentax K20D
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K10D Overview
Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Pentax K10D, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and K10D (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and K10D (APS-C) feature different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M1 II was revealed 9 years later than the K10D and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K10D being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-M1 II scores vs the K10D for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K10D Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Pentax K10D. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Pentax K10D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax K10D
E-M1 II | K10D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | December 2006 | Fresher by 119 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 210k | Clearer screen (+827k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K10D over the Olympus E-M1 II
K10D | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax K10D
E-M1 II | K10D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K10D Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Pentax K10D has dimensions of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") and a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II versus Pentax K10D in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II vs the K10D.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and K10D is 68 and 59 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K10D Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and K10D.
Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you extra detail because of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K10D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K10D Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K10D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K10D |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2006-12-15 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Total lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Auto Red Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lbs) | 793g (1.75 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 11.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 522 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $700 |