Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K200D
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Revealed September 2008
- Older Model is Pentax K100D S

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K200D Overview
Here is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax K200D, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and K200D (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and K200D (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.

The E-M1 II was announced 8 years later than the K200D and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-M1 II grades versus the K200D in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K200D Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Pentax K200D. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax K200D
E-M1 II | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | September 2008 | Fresher by 98 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus E-M1 II
K200D | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax K200D
E-M1 II | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II has external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Pentax K200D has sizing of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") having a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax K200D in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II and the K200D.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and K200D is 68 and 61 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out technical specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and K200D.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide extra detail with its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K200D |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2008-09-01 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lb) | 690 gr (1.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | Two | One |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $600 |