Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E85

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Pentax Optio E85 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
10
Overall
25

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E85 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Announced September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Pentax E85
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
  • 145g - 93 x 58 x 24mm
  • Announced September 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E85 Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Pentax E85, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E85 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and E85 (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-M1 II was released 7 years later than the E85 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax E85 being a Compact camera.

Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M1 II scores vs the E85 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax E85

 E-M1 II E85 
AnnouncedSeptember 2016September 2009More recent by 86 months
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1037k230kSharper screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Pentax E85 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 E85 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax E85

 E-M1 II E85 

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E85 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Pentax E85 has dimensions of 93mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M1 II versus Pentax E85 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II versus the E85.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E85 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and E85 is 68 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E85 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E85 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching specifications. The photograph here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and E85.

Plainly, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II should have an edge in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E85 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E85 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E85 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography information
Pentax E85 Portrait photography information
75
focusing manually
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
21
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography information
Pentax E85 Street photography information
78
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
offers focus by touch
weather proofing
lighter than competition (574g)
good high ISO (25,600)
47
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
Pentax E85 as a Sports photography camera
74
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
high max frames per second (60.0 frames/s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
weather proofing
sensor has phase detect AF
not so great battery life (350 CIPA)
17
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Pentax E85
72
lighter than competition (574g)
weather proofing
offers focus by touch
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
not so great battery life (350 shots)
51
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (32mm)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Landscape photography camera
Pentax E85 as a Landscape photography camera
76
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
weather proofing
has dual storage slots
not so great battery life (350 per charge)
23
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (32mm)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual control
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Vlogging camera
Pentax E85 as a Vlogging camera
79
selfie friendly display
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect focusing
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 resolution)
includes microphone jack
lighter than competition (574g)
22
wide angle not the best (32mm)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E85 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax E85
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIPentax Optio E85
General Information
Make Olympus Pentax
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Pentax Optio E85
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2016-09-19 2009-09-17
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW pictures
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 32-96mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.9-5.2
Macro focusing distance - 10cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 1,037k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 2 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 640x480
Video data format MOV, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 gr (1.27 pounds) 145 gr (0.32 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 93 x 58 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 D-LI95
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 2 1
Pricing at launch $1,700 $0