Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax H90
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d6a8/5d6a8efc6173ad51d40b76d61867f6bcdc4ef7fc" alt="Pentax Optio H90 front Pentax Optio H90 front"
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax H90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 153g - 101 x 65 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax H90 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Pentax H90, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and H90 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and H90 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M1 II was unveiled 6 years later than the H90 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax H90 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-M1 II grades vs the H90 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax H90 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Pentax Optio H90. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Pentax H90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax H90
E-M1 II | H90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 81 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax H90 over the Olympus E-M1 II
H90 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax H90
E-M1 II | H90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax H90 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Pentax H90 has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II versus Pentax H90 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II against the H90.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c6b5/2c6b5190cff734a8a3533bc4f7a6049c330a5e06" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax H90 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax H90 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and H90 is 68 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6087/b6087a8df656504c727918832937b3c1dcdaec8f" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax H90 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax H90 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax H90 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by looking at specs. The visual below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and H90.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you more detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22043/22043404de49a51366bb9ed0fd337b7716c863db" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax H90 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax H90 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax H90 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88276/882768c7be51edcd8ddd74b390e66622d4167c1a" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax H90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax H90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax H90 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Optio H90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Optio H90 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2010-01-25 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Prime |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 153g (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 101 x 65 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | Single |
Price at launch | $1,700 | $150 |