Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax RS1500
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1de/ce1defc693d186d489caa9ba163f0305eaf354f0" alt="Pentax Optio RS1500 front Pentax Optio RS1500 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax RS1500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-110mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed March 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax RS1500 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Pentax RS1500, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Pentax. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and RS1500 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and RS1500 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M1 II was launched 5 years later than the RS1500 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax RS1500 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-M1 II grades versus the RS1500 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax RS1500 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Pentax Optio RS1500. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Pentax RS1500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax RS1500
E-M1 II | RS1500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | March 2011 | More recent by 68 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax RS1500 over the Olympus E-M1 II
RS1500 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax RS1500
E-M1 II | RS1500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax RS1500 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Pentax RS1500 has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II versus Pentax RS1500 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II against the RS1500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36c19/36c194ec1ba30be251a94b3836045a865b9dc949" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax RS1500 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax RS1500 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and RS1500 is 68 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f625d/f625d3bd17853b49371c2b642e0cd797535a74ae" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax RS1500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax RS1500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax RS1500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by checking out specifications. The graphic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and RS1500.
Plainly, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will show more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II will have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1f49/a1f49e202c34f2ffff572399b57cfd747bf72822" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax RS1500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax RS1500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax RS1500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34001/34001520dd07d4e92d461a60f1a52a9c3fa19b6f" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax RS1500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax RS1500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax RS1500 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Optio RS1500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Optio RS1500 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2011-03-16 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-110mm (3.9x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1500s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 3.90 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 157g (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 260 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $150 |