Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2011
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and WG-1 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WG-1 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was announced 5 years after the WG-1 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-1 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-M1 II scores against the WG-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Pentax Optio WG-1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax WG-1
E-M1 II | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | February 2011 | Newer by 69 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
WG-1 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-1
E-M1 II | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Pentax WG-1 has proportions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II against the WG-1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and WG-1 is 68 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through technical specs. The pic here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and WG-1.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will render extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2011-02-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 3.90 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lbs) | 157g (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 260 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
Price at release | $1,700 | $350 |