Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung DV300F
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Launched January 2012
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung DV300F, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and DV300F (16MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and DV300F (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was introduced 3 years earlier than the DV300F which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung DV300F being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores versus the DV300F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Samsung DV300F. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung DV300F
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | DV300F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
DV300F | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | November 2009 | Newer by 26 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung DV300F
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | DV300F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro enjoys external measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Samsung DV300F has proportions of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung DV300F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro against the DV300F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and DV300F is 77 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over specifications. The image underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and DV300F.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro having a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Samsung DV300F will offer extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung DV300F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung DV300F |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-11-10 | 2012-01-02 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453 grams (1.00 lbs) | 133 grams (0.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | BP88 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $566 | $200 |