Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b169f/b169f2b717cb8d5ef4499816cf19dad2fd0b1dbd" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 front"
94 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2006
- New Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Launched January 2011
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and FH25 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FH25 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-400 was announced 5 years before the FH25 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH25 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-400 grades against the FH25 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Panasonic FH25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FH25
E-400 | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Olympus E-400
FH25 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | September 2006 | More recent by 52 months |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FH25
E-400 | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 comes with physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Panasonic FH25 has specifications of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-400 vs the FH25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80064/80064279c86763d54ab6d1653b303ff35da48996" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and FH25 is 77 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f365/4f365405029afc3257c6128ad5ac6e5e39e7fe76" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and FH25.
As you have seen, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-400 using its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic FH25 will provide you with extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older E-400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51395/51395f152a985ccc6021b8a2d902d173104092f6" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fcc7/1fcc7c80cbdfc4a664e6ed0e1457a8da1030ac5b" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH25 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS35 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2006-09-14 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 pounds) | 159g (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $599 | $180 |