Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63bd5/63bd549202ff236b9bc86cddba608e6a029457e0" alt="Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and WG-1 GPS (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WG-1 GPS (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M1 II was brought out 5 years after the WG-1 GPS which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-1 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the WG-1 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-M1 II | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | August 2011 | More modern by 63 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Olympus E-M1 II
WG-1 GPS | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-M1 II | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II provides physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-1 GPS has dimensions of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II versus the WG-1 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e4e8/1e4e8cd533f81993b0a2d7bc5c852709f5a69f6e" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and WG-1 GPS is 68 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7c75/a7c753e1fb5c24aa86a309b317a5183bdfe6623b" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The picture here should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and WG-1 GPS.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will give more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af758/af7581f5a9dc2977ff6273da336474e9868864ed" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13708/137089b825cdcecc807dfc8288a68dfa886caafc" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1500s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 3.90 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 260 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Two | One |
Pricing at release | $1,700 | $350 |