Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WS80
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
95 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WS80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.8-4.7) lens
- 125g - 92 x 60 x 22mm
- Revealed August 2009
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WS80 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WS80, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Pentax. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and WS80 (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WS80 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M1 II was revealed 7 years later than the WS80 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WS80 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M1 II matches up against the WS80 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WS80 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Pentax Optio WS80. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Pentax WS80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax WS80
E-M1 II | WS80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | August 2009 | Fresher by 87 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WS80 over the Olympus E-M1 II
WS80 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WS80
E-M1 II | WS80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WS80 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II has physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Pentax WS80 has proportions of 92mm x 60mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WS80 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the WS80.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and WS80 is 68 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WS80 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The photograph below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and WS80.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide greater detail because of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WS80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WS80 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Optio WS80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Optio WS80 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2009-08-05 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Prime |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.8-4.7 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 3.40 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 125g (0.28 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 92 x 60 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Launch pricing | $1,700 | $220 |