Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Q-S1
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Introduced August 2014
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M1 II versus Pentax Q-S1, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M1 II was announced 2 years later than the Q-S1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-M1 II grades versus the Q-S1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Pentax Q-S1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax Q-S1
E-M1 II | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | August 2014 | Fresher by 26 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
Q-S1 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax Q-S1
E-M1 II | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Pentax Q-S1 has measurements of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Pentax Q-S1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II against the Q-S1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and Q-S1 is 68 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing just by looking through specifications. The visual here will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and Q-S1.
To sum up, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with greater detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Q-S1 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2014-08-04 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 203 grams (0.45 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 250 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $250 |