Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-10
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
93 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-10 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-10, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and WG-10 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WG-10 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M1 II was unveiled 3 years later than the WG-10 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-10 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M1 II grades versus the WG-10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Pentax WG-10. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Pentax WG-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax WG-10
| E-M1 II | WG-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2016 | June 2013 | More recent by 40 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| WG-10 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-10
| E-M1 II | WG-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focus |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Pentax WG-10 has measurements of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 II versus the WG-10.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and WG-10 is 68 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-10 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and WG-10.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will resolve extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-10 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax WG-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax WG-10 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Released | 2016-09-19 | 2013-06-21 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 0.7 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 1.20 m |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 260 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Two | Single |
| Pricing at release | $1,700 | $0 |