Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Pentax WG-3 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
43
Overall
40

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
Pentax WG-3 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
  • Revealed July 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview

Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-3 GPS, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") use different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M1 II was introduced 3 years after the WG-3 GPS which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M1 II scores against the WG-3 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax WG-3 GPS

 E-M1 II WG-3 GPS 
RevealedSeptember 2016July 2013More modern by 39 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k460kClearer display (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Olympus E-M1 II

 WG-3 GPS E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-3 GPS

 E-M1 II WG-3 GPS 
Manually focus More exact focus
Display dimension3"3"Identical display size

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Pentax WG-3 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-3 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the WG-3 GPS.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and WG-3 GPS is 68 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by checking out specs. The picture below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and WG-3 GPS.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography info
Pentax WG-3 GPS Portrait photography info
75
you can focus manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focusing
supports RAW files
40
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Street photography with Pentax WG-3 GPS
78
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
has focus by touch
environment sealing
lighter than competitors in class (574g)
very good high ISO (25,600)
58
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than competition (238g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
Pentax WG-3 GPS as a Sports photography camera
74
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet mode (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
has phase detect AF
terrible battery pack (350 per charge)
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather sealing
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery (240 shots)
lack of phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography highlights
Pentax WG-3 GPS Travel photography highlights
72
lighter than competitors in class (574g)
environment sealing
has focus by touch
good resolution (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
terrible battery pack (350 per charge)
68
weather sealing
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
low battery (240 shots)
more heavy than competition (238 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography details
Pentax WG-3 GPS Landscape photography details
76
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
has double storage slots
terrible battery pack (350 per charge)
53
you can focus manually
really wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
low battery (240 shots)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging factors
Pentax WG-3 GPS Vlogging factors
79
display is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection focusing
high res video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
has external mic port
lighter than competitors in class (574 grams)
34
really wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
does not have external microphone support
more heavy than competition (238g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-3 GPS
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIPentax WG-3 GPS
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Pentax
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Pentax WG-3 GPS
Type Pro Mirrorless Waterproof
Introduced 2016-09-19 2013-07-19
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 125
RAW format
Lowest boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 1,037k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.40 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 pounds) 238 grams (0.52 pounds)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos 240 photos
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Card slots 2 1
Cost at launch $1,700 $350