Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-3 GPS, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was introduced 3 years after the WG-3 GPS which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M1 II scores against the WG-3 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Pentax WG-3 GPS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| E-M1 II | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2016 | July 2013 | More modern by 39 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Olympus E-M1 II
| WG-3 GPS | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-3 GPS
| E-M1 II | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Pentax WG-3 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-3 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the WG-3 GPS.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and WG-3 GPS is 68 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by checking out specs. The picture below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and WG-3 GPS.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2013-07-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) | 238 grams (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | 240 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 2 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $1,700 | $350 |