Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1

Portability
68
Imaging
58
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Ricoh CX1 front
Portability
93
Imaging
31
Features
30
Overall
30

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Released February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1 Overview

The following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh CX1, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and CX1 (9MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and CX1 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-M1 II was released 7 years after the CX1 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the CX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Ricoh CX1

 E-M1 II CX1 
ReleasedSeptember 2016February 2009Newer by 93 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k920kSharper display (+117k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 CX1 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh CX1

 E-M1 II CX1 
Manual focus More exact focusing
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh CX1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II versus the CX1.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and CX1 is 68 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over specs. The image here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and CX1.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II is going to have an edge in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography features
Ricoh CX1 Portrait photography features
74
manual focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
saves RAW files
25
manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Street photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Street photography camera
77
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
provides touch focus
weather proofing
lighter than competition in class (574g)
great high ISO (25,600)
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Sports photography camera
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
max fps high (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proofing
comes with phase detect AF
not so great battery (350 per charge)
25
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography details
Ricoh CX1 Travel photography details
72
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
weather proofing
provides touch focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
not so great battery (350 CIPA)
59
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography info
Ricoh CX1 Landscape photography info
75
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
great high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather proofing
2 card slots
not so great battery (350 shots)
41
manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual mode
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Vlogging camera
78
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection focusing
high video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
does have external mic support
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
28
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
no mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh CX1
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIRicoh CX1
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Ricoh CX1
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2016-09-19 2009-02-19
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 3456 x 2592
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW data
Lowest enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-200mm (7.1x)
Highest aperture - f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 640x480
Video file format MOV, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lb) 180 grams (0.40 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 2 1
Price at release $1,700 $299