Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1
68 Imaging
58 Features
93 Overall
72
93 Imaging
31 Features
30 Overall
30
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh CX1, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and CX1 (9MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and CX1 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M1 II was released 7 years after the CX1 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the CX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Ricoh CX1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Ricoh CX1
| E-M1 II | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2016 | February 2009 | Newer by 93 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 920k | Sharper display (+117k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| CX1 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh CX1
| E-M1 II | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh CX1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II versus the CX1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and CX1 is 68 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over specs. The image here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and CX1.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Ricoh CX1 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 180 grams (0.40 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
| Price at release | $1,700 | $299 |