Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Ricoh GR III front
Portability
90
Imaging
68
Features
62
Overall
65

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2018
  • Old Model is Ricoh GR III
  • Renewed by Ricoh GR III
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III Overview

Following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh GR III, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the GR III (24MP) is pretty close but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and GR III (APS-C) have different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M1 II was manufactured 24 months before the GR III which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-M1 II matches up against the GR III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Ricoh GR III

 E-M1 II GR III 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus E-M1 II

 GR III E-M1 II 
LaunchedSeptember 2018September 2016More modern by 24 months

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh GR III

 E-M1 II GR III 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Screen resolution1037k1037kSame screen resolution
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II features outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh GR III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II vs the GR III.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and GR III is 68 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing a spec sheet. The image underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and GR III.

As you can see, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Ricoh GR III will result in more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 II will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography factors
Ricoh GR III Portrait photography factors
75
you can focus manually
MP count decent (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
80
manual focus
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
provides face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Street photography with Ricoh GR III
78
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
provides touch focus
weather proofing
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
good high ISO (25,600)
84
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
offers touch to focus
lighter than competitors in class (257 grams)
very good ISO range (102,400)
screen does not articulate
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GR III as a Sports photography camera
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
fast shooting (60.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
weather proofing
comes with phase detect autofocus
bad battery power (350 per charge)
75
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
provides tracking autofocus
sensor has phase detect AF
can't change focal length (28mm)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography factors
Ricoh GR III Travel photography factors
72
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
weather proofing
provides touch focus
MP count decent (20MP)
selfie friendly display
bad battery power (350 per charge)
69
lighter than competitors in class (257g)
offers touch to focus
decent megapixels (24MP)
missing Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography factors
Ricoh GR III Landscape photography factors
76
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
weather proofing
has dual storage slots
bad battery power (350 per charge)
69
manual focus
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
no low pass filter
very good ISO range (102,400)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
missing Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 II
Vlogging with Ricoh GR III
79
selfie friendly display
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection autofocus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have external microphone jack
lighter than others in class (574g)
37
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors in class (257 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh GR III
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIRicoh GR III
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Ricoh GR III
Category Pro Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2016-09-19 2018-09-25
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1 and 3:2
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 25600 102400
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28mm (1x)
Max aperture - f/2.8-16
Macro focus distance - 6cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dot 1,037 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Optical (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 gr (1.27 pounds) 257 gr (0.57 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Storage slots 2 Single
Launch price $1,700 $900