Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2018
- Old Model is Ricoh GR III
- Renewed by Ricoh GR III

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh GR III, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the GR III (24MP) is pretty close but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and GR III (APS-C) have different sensor size.

The E-M1 II was manufactured 24 months before the GR III which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-M1 II matches up against the GR III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Ricoh GR III. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Ricoh GR III
E-M1 II | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus E-M1 II
GR III | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2018 | ![]() | September 2016 | More modern by 24 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh GR III
E-M1 II | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 1037k | Same screen resolution |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II features outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh GR III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II vs the GR III.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and GR III is 68 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing a spec sheet. The image underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and GR III.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Ricoh GR III will result in more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 II will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Ricoh GR III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Ricoh GR III |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2018-09-25 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-16 |
Macro focus distance | - | 6cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) | 257 gr (0.57 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Launch price | $1,700 | $900 |