Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Announced February 2012
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) feature different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1 II was brought out 4 years later than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
E-M1 II | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | February 2012 | More recent by 57 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Clearer screen (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus E-M1 II
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
E-M1 II | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 68 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching specifications. The photograph below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus E-M1 II will result in extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2012-02-02 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) | 550 gr (1.21 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 400 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Retail price | $1,700 | $871 |