Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
45
Overall
52

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Announced February 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview

In this article, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) feature different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M1 II was brought out 4 years later than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 E-M1 II GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
AnnouncedSeptember 2016February 2012More recent by 57 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k920kClearer screen (+117k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 E-M1 II GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 68 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching specifications. The photograph below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus E-M1 II will result in extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography details
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Portrait photography details
75
focusing manually
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
74
you can focus manually
good resolution (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography advice
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Street photography advice
78
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
features focus by touch
weather sealing
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
above average ISO range (25,600)
55
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (550g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography info
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography info
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet shooting (1/32,000s)
max frames per second high (60.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
weather sealing
supports phase detect AF
low battery (350 per charge)
48
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography features
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography features
72
lighter than others in class (574g)
weather sealing
features focus by touch
good megapixels (20MP)
selfie friendly display
low battery (350 CIPA)
59
good resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
heavier than competition in class (550g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography info
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography info
76
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
does not have low pass filter
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
two card slots
low battery (350 per charge)
63
you can focus manually
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3")
good resolution (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Vlogging camera
79
selfie friendly display
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focusing
great video quality (4096 x 2160 pxls)
comes with external mic socket
lighter than others in class (574g)
24
decently wide (24mm)
features face detection autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic jack
heavier than competition in class (550 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIRicoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Category Pro Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2016-09-19 2012-02-02
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4928 x 3264
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 200
RAW pictures
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-85mm (3.5x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 180 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/3200 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 gr (1.27 pounds) 550 gr (1.21 pounds)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs 400 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Two One
Retail price $1,700 $871